25 Feb 2024 4:48 am
You can't win in a corrupt system - the child molester is correct. There are no circumstances under which Trump is going to be allowed back in power. This disgraceful string of **** court proceedings (one with no evidence and the other with no actual crimes) stand testimony to this. Both were successful despite being unsupportable in their own ways - carried out by degenerates with obvious political animus, resulting in utterly ludicrous fines against Trump, and not many people cared to raise an eye about the implications of either.ConservativeWave » 24 Feb 2024, 1:21 am » wrote: ↑ Dem Mayor Henyard accused of launching police raids against businesses that won’t 'pay the queen's ransom'... 'I'm sure that they were asked to donate,' a local trustee said, assuming 'most likely they didn't make a donation' !!
CORRUPTION ! Plain and FU*@ING SIMPLE !! ...AND, It can be assumed that the Democrats are playing this game ACROSS the entire NATION !!
IT'S Time... TIME to END the ENTIRE Mother FUK-ing CABAL !!
https://www.foxnews.com/media/democrat- ... ens-ransom
Since we've had a successful trial with no evidence - and a successful trial with no crime, where the verdict was given before the trial even started, I fully expect future verdicts against Trump to be given with no trial at all. Have you also noticed how everything Trump requests in these fabricated, predatory proceedings is flat-out denied? We now have Letitia James immediately demanding her $400m with menaces..
Who's stepping in to make the people involved account for behaviour which has visible extreme partiality, favouring the prosecution in these **** cases, apparently on the grounds the defendant's name is Trump?.. no one is.. isn't it weirdly quiet?
Checks and balances against corruption work as long as they aren't also corrupted - and they are utterly corrupted. You can't win on a slanted playing field- and this playing field is approaching the perpendicular. It's going to play out anyway, but I fear ugliness is likely to be the over-riding motif, rather than victory
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.